@NoOne phil,
I have SEVERAL problems with this concept but, for the sake of saving time, I will only list the few which contradict your argument as a whole.
The fundamental basis of this argument is:
"
The driving principle is this, if one cannot think correctly, they cannot act correctly-or even effect human will".
How do you, through this method of thought, define or describe "correctly"? To assume you know the answer to this immediately disqualifies your statement. This puts you in the category of those who cannot think.
The second downfall of this argument comes with the question:
"
How could it be that if one did not know these things that they could ever believe that they can rightly think about anything at all?"
This, again, comes to the conclusion that you are correct and that everyone who does not think like you is wrong. This immediately discourages your arguments validity because it "defines" a world in which one is incapable of being right save for you. This is do to interpretation and perspective. So I would ask that you provide a more solid argument for this theory or admit that you have been overly obsessive with a certain class of ideas and are incapable of expanding outside of them.