They are all the same/equivalent.
All 'potentiality' is 'actuality' is 'reality', for/as one Perspective or another.

Holiday, I will try to say this as short and sweet as possible by use of your own words.

Actuality are waves.
Potentiality is the possibility of being a source for waves.
Reality is that which exists: waves and their sources.

Hope this helps.

Here's an interesting discussion by Kierkegaard on Aristotle's theory of potentiality and actuality

Philosophical Fragments

Here's some points from SK:
* There's a difference between a coming into existence change and a mere alteration of something already in existence
* Actuality is not necessity
* Necessity cannot come into existence, cannot move from potentiality to actuality, it already is
* Possibility and actuality do not differ in essence but in being (think Kant's 100 rixdaler)
* There is a difference between the immutability of the past and the immutability of the necessary.

This is what I don't get. Sure reality is based on actuality, but it isn't all of it, even though actuality is monistic.

But what is the force putting monistic to dualistic. Potentiality right? ~ which resides in the consciousness?

As much as I'd like to believe that (idealism is better!!!), if actuality was this monistic force it does not imply it can't be broken down. It leaves the possibility for actuality to be broken down into subsections that imply actuality as a whole(not that actuality is literally like this), but still not exactly the whole of actuality.

When a piece of actuality is related to, it is no longer the whole of actuality, even though it implies what it is exactly, but not absolutely. :cool:

So the piece now has the potential and is a flavor for reality, being an individual's consciousness.

Necessity is not just implied through reality and not actuality. Thats absurd! It is of actuality too. Potentiality is like the energy and necessity is like the work. When potentiality is not there, actuality is balanced, and no necessity required. Without potentiality there is no ability to have a necesity nor is there one required.

Reality has potentiality and is therefore a necessity to come back to actuality as a whole, being that it is just a piece.

The necessity is there in that actuality is absolute to itself, but if related to as a piece of it, there can be no absoluteness, only intrinsic implications.

Also, I do not believe waves are actuality absolutely, therefore probably not the actuality you guys are talking about.

All i can offer in this response is 'this' Perspective. The world that I see, that i perceive. A Perspective that is as unique as the world manifested to/as this Perspective. I am not 'selling' it. It is sufficient in it's existence. As is youPerspective. I think that if I can offer some definitions, as I see them, you might better understand what I offer.
First, I'd have to take exception with your assertion that 'actuality' is 'monistic'. Whatever is perceived, is actual reality to the Perceiver, the 'Perspective', 'you/me/him/it..'. Now! Every moment. For us each and all, our actual reality is our entire universe, each moment. Our universes, not the universes. We are one and the same with the universes as perceived by us. We arise, in/as the moment, along with/as the momentarily perceived universe, the universe of Now!
Existence is dualistic. Contextual. Everything exists. If, by 'actual' you mean the individually uniquely perceived universes of the Now! Then actuality is, must be 'contextual'.
Interesting note; if there is any ___ that is 'monistic', One, 'perfectly symmetrical', then there, by definition, cannot be anything else! Ever! 'Anywhere'!
"Reality must rigidly adhere to that which is in an unchanging state of universal permanence." -Vedas
That defines 'perfect symmetry', which can have no qualities or features of any sort (acontextual, non-dual).
That also, oddly enough, defines 'Consciousness/Mind'. Without the 'limiting factor' of Perspective, 'Consciousness' cannot be 'Conscious' of Mind. (No features.) We are the Perspectives of One Consciousness, each unique, upon One Mind (perfect symmetry. unfifferentiated potential).


Limited Perspectives, us. Our glance limits the 'completeness' of an undetectable perfectly symmetrical Mind into bite sized (now contextual, duality) chunks (our universes at every moment of perception).
Synchronously!
See, nothing really changes, it's just a matter of Perspective...


Mind = quantum probability wave field = undifferentiated potential... That is 'potential', Mind. But that 'potential' cannot be actualized, perceived, but by each and every possible Perspective. We just think in terms of 'potential' due to 'our' limited Perspectives. We do not 'see' the correlation of all Perspectives, as we are 'limitations'. All is in Consciousness, though. Consciousness observes us as POVs of Mind. Nothing... ever... changes, nor can change as "Reality" is 'monistic', and there can be nothing happening (features, qualities...)


We might be seen as subsectional actualities, but additionally, all of the 'subsets' annihilate immediately upon arising because 'Reality' cannot be dualistically 'actual'; '1' + '1' + '1' + '1'.... = 0


It is the 'whole' of your actual reality. I have shown, basically, why thetre can be no 'the' actual reality, but there can be 'our' actual realities. All different universes...

's it for now..
Peace

How is this analogy relevant? Actuality has no values.

Metaphor... it doesn't matter, let it go..

Well, in the words of a wise, young fellow from New Jersey, "...words have no meaning..." However, here is how I would define these three and how I have used and intend to use them.

Reality: everything, existance, the world, life, etc. syn. w/ actuality
Potentiality: an idea, a function of memory, which exists in reality as that idea only