Well, just because we live in a finite universe doesn't mean there was a designer. Additionally, it doesn't mean any existence was intellectually designed.
You're also contradicting yourself here. You say in your other post things are because they are, there is no question of why, and then here you scream that there must be a designer (implying there is an answer, there is a why)!
Your second contradiction lies here: "O ya.. only your word's can prove or dispove such and existence, just because people cant physicaly show proof of such, dosnt mean there isnt such, for you cant even show proof there is not, for the only proof we are allowed to have are the word's we say, therefore we make the proof with are word's..."
Well, if you follow this theory then the proof you have of a designer also falls under the category of just words. Or are you just going to excuse yourself that categorization and believe your 'proof' transcends this?
Perhaps I just didn't understand you.
Im not implying a single thing... Im just displaying a side of thought within the finite thought's we can think concerning this topic of a creator/designer of this existence we live in...
Allso there is an oppisite hint that could show that there is not.
Yet it will allway's come down to the point of which people think what they think is more true or completly true, compaired to what the other think's..
Yet personaly, Im in the middle, of everything.
I pick not to go right nor the oppisite, nor do I pick good nor do I pick the oppisite...
Nor do I pick a God, or the oppisite...
(word's are only proof if you say they are, therefore you make the proof your self, it's then a madder of how much more your proof wiegh's over another's proof that they have made...)
Please dont miss quote me... your added perception is not mine, keep such to your self and just ask what I meant... therefore I can give you better understanding of what perception I was portraying within finite, therefore you would not see such "contradiction's".
Also it's best for one not to blindly go about calling contradiction's, without stating what and why they are contradiction's(also by showing what two peice's do not fit to geather)(save's me more time&less work:rolleyes:doing such4u)(due to Im allway's a neutral)
Yet to end it all with such grace and wisdom...and to answer the only question that you asked. "Or are you just going to excuse yourself that categorization and believe your 'proof' transcends this?"
No, there is only one thing that can ever transcend such a categorization, and that is the "Truth" and only the "Truth".
Word's become more than word's when they are true, therefore they have more weight than those that are not true, mainly due to the fact that they are oppisite's within finite thought in are existence.
Secondly... it's not a theory, I was portraying a finite oppisite thought within are existence that hint's to the existence of a designer of this existence from a true infinity existence, hence the reason why I attached a link to an other topic, to relate.
Some time's i beat around the bush sorry about that I should have just said that there is no such thing as proof, only truth.
I was just hoping another would see that truth...
The reason why, is due to the fact the truth was not made by human's...(human's say and make own from word's yet word's only only word's unless there the truth, and not made from there own perception or the perception of another.)
For that we can all agree on.
So what did create truth?
Example-> Im on the earth and drop and apple, it will fall
And not because I or another say it dose...because it dose, for it's the truth.
And the truth is it's own proof.
So do I believe proof? Well you did miss understand, because I dont believe in proof, only the truth.
I hope this has cleared up some miss understanding's of my intent's of what i meant, if it has not, please ask more question's
(instead of slander like comment's:rolleyes:)