Thats a lot of words to attempt to explain a very simple "untruth"
here's another lot.
as far as i am concerned there are no truths only "untruths"..the absence of absolute truth makes all things meaning less.
The word "meaning" is conceptual abstraction born of human thinking and conditioned by the human perspective on (un)reality/existence.
these viewpoints are naturally erroneous on a universal/eternal scale and therefore the attempt to define the truth using an erroneous concept as a foundation to start the investigation from will only result in an erroneous conclusion.
most theories on this planet have been developed based on erroneous assumptions which can naturally only lead to false answers.
whether something is meaningless or not is a "meaningless" thing to try to divine.
Because the word meaning is a human abstract concept and not a universal element that is essentially built in to the core of all aspects of existence.
why should we need to have a meaning? meanings are finite "depending on the context/case" relative "truths" (untruths) that we use as tools to relate with the phenomena that we encounter in the sphere that seems to be "not self" (the outside world), but they are only tools, and have no real substance in the objective universe/reality.
hope i make sense.
on a less etheric level; as for the mathematical and scientific meaningless
that occurs with many scientific theories this is also normal because the way a theory produces results are chiefly influenced by the ASSUMPTIONS made about the basic "truths" or "facts" or "data" upon which the theory is based.
E=MCsquared would be well screwed if we live in a world where the value of C was variable depending on what part of the planet you were on or what time of year it was.."E" would ha a series of different answers depending on the "C" factor..all of which would be "true" answers in their particular case.
The truth is there is no truth.
and that's why all the untruths in science work.
within the laws of the other untruths.
A friend of mine prefers to call this "relative truth"
which makes sense to me as if there are no truths then the sentence there are no truths means that it is a lie...meaning that there are truths...one thing cancels the other out.
a bit like existence.
if you look at a/c current flow. on off on off on off.
it's like existence.
let's look into the sphere/dimension of "potential" or "possibility"
what is the most impossible thing of all?
answer; that there is anything existing at all except for infinit dark void and timelessness.
if that was all then that would be "everything"
the nothing is everything.
suddenly zero becomes one.
the nothing IS "all there is" all there is means everything.
which is an existential object.
i believe that we are constantly being created and destroyed within the same split moment repeatedly.
it's impossible to have just empty nothingness so as that happenms the void is instantly filled with all things in pottential existance
making the universe.
in the very same split second the impossibility of it all crushes that same universe into an infinite void again. and so we flicker.
look a t maths look at electric current atoms molecukles tachyons anything in the universe you can find these two principles even the way a PC thinks is in 0 an 1 nothing and everything is and not is.
two sides of a coin supporting each other.