@rockpie phil,
the
philosophical issue I have with 'autonomy' is that it in effect it makes the individual conscience the sole arbiter in many matters of conscience. In property issues and other matters that can be settled by civil law this is not much of an issue. But in many other areas there are, as you say, no clear grounds on which to make judgements. Such issues often come up in regards to (say) euthenasia, genetic engineering, minority rights, and so on.
My personal feeling is that the individual needs to recognise that there is a moral or ethical order by which their own conduct should be regulated. But as soon as you say that, you will be challenged on the basis that the existence of such a law is already a matter of individual judgement. Traditionally, moral law has been seen to be expressed or embedded in the Judeo-Christian religious culture. It is the move away from that culture towards a more secular outlook that highlights this exact problem.
On one had, I recognize the importance of individual conscience and rights, and would never suggest these be limited or curtalied. But on the other, in the absence of the recognition of a moral law, whether this be Christian, or some other - and there is not a great range value systems to select from, at the end of the day - then there is really no guarantee that the individual's choices will be made in good faith or with reference to anything other than naked self-interest. And I think we are certainly seeing evidence of that in the behaviour of the US Financial Industry. (About whom even ethically conservative contributors on this forum will say 'well, you can't blame them for wanting to make a buck....)
I think this is a conflict in the very constitution of democratic liberalism. I think that at the outset, democratic liberalism assumed an ethical code. But the assumed ethical code was very much embedded in the Judeo-Christian ethos. To the extent that this itself is now under threat in a 'militantly secular' society, I don't know if the conscience of the individual can still be seen as the foundation for ethical choices.
It is a very difficult question indeed and the subject of
among many other titles.