Nobody in existence has ever been capable of volunteering to be conceived. This implies that everyone throughout the history of the universe was forced against there own will to be conceived. Therefore, a person cannot be held morally responsible for the main effect of his/her conception, his/her life.

Does that imply that unless what I do is voluntary, I am doing it contrary to my will? I am being forced to do it

Unintended things can happen from any action, good, bad or neutral. It's natural when these unintended consequences are harmful or fatal that we look for the person to blame. However this isn't just a search for moral culpability, but a desire for revenge. The same can happen when dire consequences arise from good or neutral intentions, but we are more likely to recognise them as being unreasonable.

Let me begin by attempting to define morality. It is "a set of rules that guide individuals in the subject of good and bad behavior". Since good and bad behavior is subjective, morality must be subjective too. Let me explain the following principle: "If you were forced against your own will to take part in a certain event, then you are not morally responsible for the effect, or effects, of the event under consideration." For example, consider an 18-year-old man, Jeff, being held at gunpoint by another 18-year-old man, Jack. This hypothetical setting is taking place in Jack's home. Jack tells Jeff he will kill him, unless Jeff snorts the line of cocaine on Jack's table. Fearing for his life, Jeff snorts the cocaine. After this, Jack puts down the gun and lets Jeff leave the house. While still under the influence of the cocaine, Jeff eventually kills a random person, Joe, walking down the street and in a matter of minutes gets arrested for murder. The fate of Jack is irrelevant. Should Jeff be held morally responsible for the murder of Joe? For the sake of argument, I am assuming that Jeff would have never murdered Joe if he had not been under the influence of cocaine. Let me remind you that Jeff was forced against his own will to snort the cocaine. Thus, according to the principle above, he should not be morally responsible for the murder of Joe, an effect of snorting the cocaine. The main point is that if a reasonable person were to agree with the principle above, then he/she would hold the belief that suicide is not immoral. Nobody in existence has ever been capable of volunteering to be conceived. This implies that everyone throughout the history of the universe was forced against there own will to be conceived. Therefore, a person cannot be held morally responsible for the main effect of his/her conception, his/her life.