Freedom of Speech (again).

Get Email Updates Email this Topic Print this Page

sammy phil
 
Reply Sat 13 Mar, 2010 10:23 am
@Dave Allen,
if a person is trying to have their voice heard they have found this truth to be self evident in their own beliefs. this was stated in the declaration and i think they held it close in hopes to have atleast mental room to work on what they want to say in safety, leading to freedom of more then just body.
 
kennethamy
 
Reply Sat 13 Mar, 2010 10:28 am
@Insty,
Insty;139242 wrote:
Yes, this link supports my point.


Yes and no. There is such a guide stemming from the Holmes decision.
 
Insty
 
Reply Sat 13 Mar, 2010 12:16 pm
@kennethamy,
kennethamy;139330 wrote:
Yes and no. There is such a guide stemming from the Holmes decision.

Holmes used the example of falsely shouting fire in a crowded theater in articulating the "clear and present danger" test for determining whether expression was protected under the first amendment. The "clear and present" danger test has long since been abandoned.
 
 

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.02 seconds on 03/02/2024 at 11:11:31