One cannot perform a genuine act of benevolence without meeting the eye of egoism.

For actions of injustice are commonly held as more profitable than actions of justice and the opinions of others including God's are of the highest value.

But if morality is more of an intuition, then one is likely to act justly regardless of belief system or interest in beneficiaries among society with the complete absence of self. However, the variations moral perception are not perceived by all.

Those who see it usually acquire it through indoctrination and never understands their own personal goals of morality. Those who tend to avert or miscomprehend their own perception and never distinguish right from wrong and may undermine the value of their existence while being satisfied at the same time.

They probably questioned it first, then came to an agreement.

survival instinct does not distinguish good from bad. When it comes to staying alive no one would care what God or other things/faith have to say.
God and the concept of evil is another attempt to try to satisfy the ever thursty wondering minds ours. However it has taken a new form, a form we now call religion! Morality has nothing to do with religion. Ofcourse religion did modify it enormously but to begin with morality did not came from religion. Morality is only a byproduct of human evolution, as human slowly were able to distinguish more than just pain and happniess, they slowly were able associate certain ways of behaviour into those two groups and so on...

survival instinct does not distinguish good from bad. When it comes to staying alive no one would care what God or other things/faith have to say.
God and the concept of evil is another attempt to try to satisfy the ever thursty wondering minds ours. However it has taken a new form, a form we now call religion! Morality has nothing to do with religion. Ofcourse religion did modify it enormously but to begin with morality did not came from religion. Morality is only a byproduct of human evolution, as human slowly were able to distinguish more than just pain and happniess, they slowly were able associate certain ways of behaviour into those two groups and so on...

To understand what is best for the endurance of the species is to understand the basis of ethical values. For instance, one is not likely to mate with a killer, rapist, terrorist ect. for fear of imparting genealogical traits to other generations.

To understand what is best for the endurance of the species is to understand the basis of ethical values. For instance, one is not likely to mate with a killer, rapist, terrorist ect. for fear of imparting genealogical traits to other generations. Moral indications have occurred with animals as well for the survival of their species in a nurturing manner. Right, none of this began with a deity, the figure of God made a later appearance only for the sake of keeping society more orderly.

I'm sorry, Serena, but I have to refute this thoroughly. Women have been shown over and over again to be more attracted to precisely those with what you call immoral natures. It has been posited, for instance, that women cannot distinguish initially between confidence and insanity. This is most likely an evolutionary byproduct of far more violent and anarchistic times. The most fierce and bloodthirsty mate is more likely to defend your offspring successfully.

Morality is simply a code of conduct agreed upon in a certain time and place to keep people from killing each other.

When we talk about Morality having any specific goals, than i am inclined to believe that Morality has a lot of advantages. Without being of any benefit to the structure and organism called the society, Morality may not have survived as a functional aspect of the human mind.

Moral Science was a subject taught to us in our school days. Our scriptures, folk tales, gospels, - almost all lessons we are told to read are having to do with moral laws or issues. No one can dispute the nature and effect of Morality on the individual and the society as a whole. If we have to study the full scope of Morality, one can easily understand the advantages. I think i can build up an argument leading to an tentative answer. Lets see, how?:-
1) Morality aims to allow a social conduct that is acceptable by the immediate society.
2) It helps in the tacit Social Contract individuals enter into when dealing with institutions built up by the society for e.g Governments, marriage etc.
3) It allows social order, in other words social harmony among fellow beings and between authorities.
4) Conduct, Contract, Order and Harmony is due to the appeal to Morality.
5) Morality perhaps is the foundation on which Civilisations took roots and eventually prospered.
6) One Goal of Civilisation is Peace and Prosperity.
7) Therefore, One of the Main Goals of Morality is gaining the advantage of Peace and Prosperity.