Resurrection.

What thread or post are you most proud of?

Forget for a minute that pride could be our downfall.

Some people have been here hours some have been here for years, time to pull out the Sunday best.

What are your most fondest, gratifying, astonishing, delusional threads and posts, sharings and breakthroughs, triumphs and disasters, creativities and extinctions?

What has been you proudest moment here on in the Glorious Philosophy Forum?
Show us.

Can not link to Art, Food and Bulbs > Sophia's Kitchen

My Philosophy is pretty basic. Enjoy, work, Celebrate Life
Funny thing is U need Others to do so
Have to amke friends !

I have Friends, but like more !


Visiting old friends.

This is a practical exercise, I wonder how many of you are truly prideful of what you have accomplished here?

sometime sun, is prideful of his continued presence and participation.

)

And I thought it was going to be about easter and the resurrection?
Bodily ressurection or just persistence of spirit?
The mighty play goes on and each of us can contribute a verse?

Resurrection of spirit, what do you think this is? My spirit is strong here.
This is the world we must re-enter. Spirit we must re-enter.
The mighty play still goes on but has been to slow for my continued interest lately, so in place of few new ideas i thought some old ones, some favourites would hit the spot.
Perhaps there is no good climax perhaps the lessons of the play have already gone by and i missed them?
I cant believe more people aren't interseted in doing this, i am really disapointed, i know some of my threads are dismissable but i dont think this one is.
Is there nothing you are proud of contributing that i may have missed so i can in turn experience from its resurrection?

[CENTER]You can maybe Redirect my anger about trismegisto. He was abusive to me twice and really rude to xris. I have seen no reaction yet from Moderator or Members, Senior or what. It spoils the fun to be with you.
Yes, I take medicins. But I am sure I am more sane than I care to be.

I want excuses from this member of the forum or he should have the honor to leave.

Pepijn Sweep
[/CENTER]

What thread was this in Pepijn?

As the philosopher Leibniz pointed out, if a child is born in China who is you resurrected, but who has no memories of his past life, then there is no difference between that, and you dying and a child being born in China. But, even if the child has what appear to be memories of his past life, unless they are, in fact, of his past life, they are just faux memories, not real memories. So, it those are not real memories, unless the child is identical with the person who died. But we cannot know it is the person who died unless we know that the memories are real. A circle.

How would you go about distinguishing your real memories from faux memories? And how would you attempt to prove the distinction?

In ordinary circumstance I would have public check on whether what I thought I remembered, actually occurred. Of course, in the case of supposed resurrection, we have no such recourse.

So, how would the public verify if you went to the bathroom last night?

I suppose I would have left traces of some kind. Or someone might have seen me. At least, it was verifiable in principle. There is no verification in principle of my apparent memory of a past life.

That is not a very convincing argument. Essentially what you are saying is that EVERY memory you have that is not externally verified by "the public" is a faux memory. How could this possibly be true?

No, I am not saying that. I am saying that unless it can be verified we cannot know whether it is.