@sometime sun,
Does the need for more wisdom mean you are less without it? Less wise, yes.
(Does the need for wisdom mean you are without it?) According to the perceived need, yes.
Is there a more or less wisdom? I would think so.
(Is wise a measure of the amount of wisdom?) What else is?
Is to be wise to be complete? I don't think so, we have other needs as well.
Are those who do not seek out wisdom unwise? Only according to those who do, I think.
Can one be unwise and seek wisdom at the same time? That's the point of seeking it, yes?
(Are we found with wisdom and lost without it?) It may help, but is it the end all be all answer?
With wisdom is one balanced? Like complete, no.
Is without wisdom, or unwise, or just not seeking it unbalanced?
(Can you be balanced and not be wise to wisdom?) According to us, yes.
Are philosophers unbalanced because they search for wisdom? We think so.
Are philosophers only balanced when they have found all the wisdom? You can't find it all.
(Can you be a philosopher and not have wisdom or seek it?) No.
(Is there an ALL to wisdom, does wisdom have a finishing line?) No.
Can one be totally wise or wise totally? No.
(Know or be all the wisdom?) No.
Is there a total balancing wisdom that can make a person or philosopher whole? No. It is the process of philosophy, I think, more than the end result.
If this total complete wisdom exists are we all unwise unbalanced incomplete until we have found it?
Are phillsophers unhappy without wisdom of their own? I would be.
(Are unphilosophers happy with wisdom not of their own?)[/QUOTE]