@kennethamy,
Does that mean that a scholar of Christianity is not the same thing as a philosopher either? St Thomas Aquinas springs to mind. He is touted as one of the greatest of the medieval philosopher-theologians. He was deeply involved in the religious aspects of his time (hell, the guy is a
saint), and he was also heavily involved in philosophical debates in logic, metaphysics, epistemology, philosophy of mind, moral philosophy, as well as the philosophy of religion. Likewise, Al-Kindi, the "philosopher of the Arabs," was renown in his day and even now for his translations and interpretations of Aristotle and the incorporation of those elements into his own particular philosophies and he was a devout Muslim.
And honestly, if you state that "being Islamic does not preclude the possibility of
not following
all the rules that others dictatePyrrho;123238 wrote:Remember, the claim does not apply to anyone who is not primarily a philosopher. Rather than get into a squabble about what it means to be a philosopher, which would be a contentious issue, I will simply require that most ordinary reference works refer to the person as a philosopher first in their descriptions, not as a theologian and philosopher, or a mathematician and philosopher, or anything else and philosopher.
Ok, then as an example of Al-Kindi, he wrote, "The Quantity of Books of Aristotle and What is Required for the Acquisition of Philosophy." I don't want to get into a squabble either about what it means to be a philosopher, because excluding philosophers that also theologize or vice versa is absurd to say the least.