@William,
Quick thought;
The skys the limit, we all have limiatation we need to be controled else people would believe they could fly up to that sky, alot of 'free' people jumpin goff of buildings.
No to mention the story of chicken licken, 'the sky is falling', how would we know it wont fall if we didn't know it and we were controled by something.
If you think you act acordingly and are not controlled you maybe just fogetting the lesson that taught you to be so.
There are far to many examples of the uncontrolled even slightly uncontrollable to think that it is in of our nature to act acordingly, to act controlled, without there being control instilled i find confusing. You do not have to be controlled to have been controlled.
Conditioning would be my arguement.
Lengthened though;
Why question control when it is trying to do the best for the most?
why not accept that sometimes it is best to be controlled?
even if it does not conflict with your natural law reflex that naturally agrees with the prevailing law dose not matter because you do what is right, you live within a set of boundaries you may not need control but control needs you.
And your acceptance of the law/control means that you should also fiight so the law/control is enforced upon those who need it and try to live outside of it.
I would accept my control just because i know that the would-be uncontrollable have their limits and boundaries that i need to prevail/preserve and when so needed pressure aplied.
Just be glad you have protection from the uncontrollable and that you are not one of them.
You really are controlled, we all are. In controls law.
Choice does not matter when you act accordingly, nothing to break or be broken, be glad.
The metric system controls us, i wouldn't want to go back to shillings and pence. just pence please.
Control makes things easier, if not just for the majority.