@urangutan,
I suppose no one really noticed the baseball or cricket thread was because no one is interested in baseball anymore, let alone cricket. LOL! Baseball in particular has really fallen off in popularity in America (attendance and viewing rates), although there is still a very strong following even still, especially with the global economic crisis in full swing. It's honestly become more of a family gathering event more than super-serious fan following sport. But I think cricket has a lot of good merits, it seems like a very light and pleasant sport that doesn't demand too much physical exertion in comparison to baseball.
But I would never go so far as to suppose a sport like cricket would be in anyway better than another sport like baseball since they are different sports and need to be considered on different grounds. Different rules, different objectives, different most everything.
Hilariously, baseball is much in line with "a man's test" of hitting the ball in a certain way much like a cricket. I would suppose that's why both sports have bounds. I actually watched a youtube clip of part of a cricket match, and I honestly believe Americans have adopted it ? but we call it soft ball. Seriously. It's actually a pretty fun version of baseball. I know my sister was very into it when she was in highschool. Not to say it's a girl sport, it's just a more reasonable version of baseball. And to tell the truth, I prefer it more than baseball because the underhanded pitch seems a bit more reasonable than the over-handed, 100 mph pitches in baseball. Seems a lot more enjoyable and leisurely.
I find your comment interesting though that you believe that America has not really subscribed to cricket because they do not wish to be British in any way. Well? why should they to begin with? Is it extremely necessary to be British in some way or another in order to appreciate a sport like cricket? Tell that to the Indians, Sri Lankans, Pakistani's, and ?
gasp? Austrailians. Interesting enough though, where cricket is the most popular, is where the wounds are only recently starting to heal over from British imperialism. Cricket may be a byproduct of a darker time that many nations choose to embrace as their own rather than completely reject it. How interesting is it to note how Ghandi endorsed cricket in his Satyagraha movement not because it was a superior sport, but because it became an Indian-owned sport as a form of non-violent resistance. Perhaps it may be that American's don't want to be British because they have had enough time to shape their own identity? ironically more than enough to export their own cultural products overseas with more than adequate demand.
I'm also very sorry that you perceive the French in such a bad light, especially since they are your neighbors. The French have a very long and complex history that is inextricably connected to the British history. On that note, what is considered quintessentially British like Parliamentary systems and privy counsels are fundamentally French and German in origin (i.e. Witangemut, etc.). Good ole Taswell Langmead.