@coberst phil,
coberst wrote:It appears to me that we sapiens need a "North Star" upon which to fix our voyage. We need a reference point upon which we can focus our attention when trying to determine what of value we can and should do in life. [/size]
Lately I have come to consider this north star as my moral duty, that I for some reason just "feel". It is hard to explain, but when only considering actions and not their consequences, I just sense the moral decision. I have not yet discovered a coherent system for these moral guidelines. Not letting Hitler drown would be my moral duty, yet murder would be moral in some circumstance, such as justified self-defense.
The goal of my guidelines is not creating happiness or "the Good", though it often has that effect. Usually the moral decision is marked by it being the harder decision.
I admit that technically this leaves the possibility of considering everything moral as long as one feels it as such, for example to kill infidels.
coberst wrote:I often speculate that human life is a hindrance to maximizing the 'good life', of all life, on this planet. I often speculate that if all life on this planet were given a vote in this matter that they would throw sapiens overboard. [/SIZE]
What do you think?
[/SIZE]
I don't feel guilt for being the dominant species on the planet that possibly limits the 'good life' for other species.That's how it works. And then life is pretty eat or get eaten out there anyways.