@Vasska,
Vasska;39325 wrote:In The Netherlands the government compensates students with an monthly "allowance", free use of public transportation and ability to take a loan with the general rules applying. Of course there are rules for the first too:
The Monthly "allowance" is based upon your level of education, whether you live at home or not, your parents income, and whether or not they are married. Also you can only apply for a limited amount of years, extended only for people who study medicines etc.
This ranks from a standard EUR72 for simple education to EUR92 for higher education with the possibility to get more depending on your situation. The catch being here; if you don't finish your higher eduction (lower eduction is free from this catch) you have to pay everything back including interest, additional charges and your use of public transportation.
You get a card that allows you to travel for free with the train*, bus and metro. You can either choose a week or weekend card. Limitations are not being able to travel for free on certain national holidays and having to pay on other excluded days, but with a 40% discount rate. If you don't finish your school you have to pay back the use of the card which amount about 1536 a year plus interest.
I never heard about other countries offering these benefits to students. So does your country do anything for their students?
No country compensates students.
All some countries do is forcing students to offer a bond in their future income to pay their education expenditures. - The political class pays their education and then it forces them to give a part of their now higher income in return.
The students are no better off than if free market mechanisms were in place to voluntarily offer bonds in their future income for education expenditures.
But by forcing it at the point of a gun the plebs think they get free money and the political class has more power as the money flows through them (and they can squander a part).
As education enhances future income, in a free market, the cost of education would reflect the value it brings to a person. I.e. how much it enhances future income as skilled labor is more valuable.
If governments subsidize education all that happens is that the cost of education will go up to artificial levels. To be squandered by corrupt layers of bureaucracy.
"Compensating" students is truly following the slogan "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need".
It's socialism and it doesn't work. It's essentially paying people to stay uneducated.
It's the reason we have unemployment and simultaneously a scarcity of educated workers.
Plus we all lose the value that those people would have produced.