In Norway we've had two referendums about EU membership. One in 1972 and another in 1994. Both times the people voted no. Norway, Switzerland Liechtenstein and Iceland are the only west european countries that aren't members of the union. Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway are members of the The European Economic Area (EEA). The EEA is an agreement between member states of European Free Trade Association (EFTA), the European Community, and all member states of the European Union. It allows these EFTA countries to participate in the European single market without joining the EU.
This means that Norway is practically subject to many EU laws without having any particular political power in decisions made inside the union.
There are also many disadvantages followed by a EU membership. The Norwegian agriculture has no chance against the large scale food production in mainland Europe if the import restrictions are removed.
Iceland do now consider a bid for EU membership. This means that Norway and tiny little Liechtenstein (Not even visible on the world map) probably will be left as lonely members of the EEA.
Norway and the European Union - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Here are more detailed info from Wikipedia:
In favour of membership Against membership
Further sharing of sovereignty
Norway would have to amend its constitution to become a member. It would have MEPs and its own European Commissioner, but would have to rely on the opinions of other members states in more policy areas than with today's EEA agreement.
Democratic deficit and little transparency
Currently, many EU decision makers, such as the European Commissioners, are appointed by member states' governments, and not directly by EU citizens. When national ministers gather in the Council of the European Union, their process of deciding have been criticised for not being transparent enough.
It should however be noted that the proposed Treaty of Lisbon, which is expected to come into force in early 2009, empowers the directly elected (by the people of Norway also, had it been a member) European Parliament, partly at the expense of the Council. The new treaty also requires all meetings of the Council to be held in public.
Agriculture and fisheries
In case of EU membership, Norway would have to take part in the Common Fisheries Policy. Norwegian fishing quotas would have to be shared with the rest of the EU. Some claim the coastal areas of Norway, which rely heavily on fishing industry, would suffer from a reduced share of the catch.
The often steep Norwegian topography is unfavourable for agriculture. Some fear that Norway's relatively small farming industry would be disadvantageously exposed to competition from other parts of the Internal Market. Some fear state subsidies to Norwegian farming and fisheries would be made illegal, furthermore depopulating rural areas.
Reduction in economic self-determination
Euro adoption is de jure obligatory for all new member states of the European Union, and the European Central Bank would control Norway's interest rate and monetary policy. This would, for example, make it impossible for the Norwegian government to use the rate as a political tool. In 2008, a DnB NOR economist said that Norway would not benefit sufficiently on adopting the euro due to the impact of high oil-prices on Norway's economy.
What should we do if we in the near future will have a new referendum here in Norway? Should we vote ja or nei (yes or no)?
I'm on the "Ja" side!