Reply
Mon 22 Feb, 2010 05:57 pm
I have read a bit of philosophy on my own, and am very fond of the Cynics, Seneca, Nietzsche (Also notable authors Hesse,Goethe, Camus,Huxley), yet I find I'm a bit Existential. I realize I need to develop and organize my arguments to progress myself as I am fermenting in the way of letting my character be decided more by reaction to happenstance than awareness, self reflection and knowing how to correct behaviour to a formulated outcome and way of being. Philosophy grounds a person firmly enough that they may glance outside the window of current thought and surrounding culture into a new avenue, I wish to not be corrupted by current feelings and misgivings. (There is a general sense of bitterness, defeat, distraction, tiredness, nihilism undercoating people in general, which leaves an after taste in my mouth) To most people these days to be a Cynic means to be a deadened and tired misanthrope. Also I find it difficult to voice myself, and I think working on it through this forum will help me greatly.
People decide too much upon who they are through the sufferings they bare, when those sufferings could very easily be avoided as it's joy that matters in ways of emotion, not the heavy feelings. Rationality is undervalued in matters of character (it's not instantly self gratifying?) and smeared by modern day booby traps such as Cell phone contracts and over extended government policies.
I went off topic a bit, and I'm not providing sources, or explainations- my apologies. If I am already contradicting myself on some level, please point it out.
That is all,
thank you.
@Charley phil,
Welcome to the forum, Charley
Interesting introduction, and from the looks of it, you'll bring some interesting angles into some of the discussions here I'm sure of it.
@Charley phil,
Hello there. Welcome to the forum. I hope to see you around and exchange some philosophical ideas.
@Charley phil,
Why thank you both.
Leonard, I like the quotation beneath your post,
I'm going to have to remember that one.
@Charley phil,
I think it was Camus in his notebooks that once suggested that a philosopher was one who always was watching himself from a distance.
I have always thought that one of the ways this is done is to commit one's thoughts to, as it were, paper and subject them to open discussion by reasonable people who might have different perspectives or areas of expertise.
I hope you will find at Philforum such a place where you can do this.
Welcome to Philforum!
Regards,
John