Nothing wrong there with what he wrote, although he didn't originate the concept. i think he was giving us an excuse at the time for his laying low from the authorities, but then again, it works both ways, a good business ploy.

Good luck with the "senior member" of TFI stuff - what are they doing, giving you some battlefield brevet commission? Well, anyway, good luck with the business of TFI, and good luck with those attacking, hostile apostates. They can be a bit of a sticky wicket.

Nothing wrong there with what he wrote, although he didn't originate the concept. i think he was giving us an excuse at the time for his laying low from the authorities, but then again, it works both ways, a good business ploy.

Good luck with the "senior member" of TFI stuff - what are they doing, giving you some battlefield brevet commission? Well, anyway, good luck with the business of TFI, and good luck with those attacking, hostile apostates. They can be a bit of a sticky wicket.

Colonel wrote:

Nothing wrong there with what he wrote, although he didn't originate the concept. i think he was giving us an excuse at the time for his laying low from the authorities, but then again, it works both ways, a good business ploy.

Good luck with the "senior member" of TFI stuff - what are they doing, giving you some battlefield brevet commission? Well, anyway, good luck with the business of TFI, and good luck with those attacking, hostile apostates. They can be a bit of a sticky wicket.

"sticky wicket??" Brwaaahhaahaha

A game for gentlemen?

I recall the infamous "Bodyline" series against the Ozzies.

Then there's the Hansie Cronje debacle.

Then there's the infamous ball tampering that still goes on.

Shane Warne's dalliancies, the list goes on of Cricket's most ungentlemanly conduct!

1Co 6:9 ¶ Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,
10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.

Re 21:8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.

Yes, i can rember Berg's paunchent for picking "on every little fault, always belittling, nagging, henpecking!
They are words that you may be familiar with, if you still remember your studies from when you were a member of TFI and enlightened. "

It was truly gracious and loving of him to call his wife and the mother of his children an adulteress, after he had decided he'd had enough of her and shacked up with Zerby, wasn't it?

Especially after all his bragging about his many adulterous affairs during their life together.

Quote:

1Co 6:9 ¶ Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,
10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.

Quote:

Re 21:8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.

Off to a strip joint later to chill out and have a few beers, after what has been a hard day in the real World.

Best Wishes To All and It’s About Making A Difference.

Max Wrote

Quote:

Off to a strip joint later to chill out and have a few beers, after what has been a hard day in the real World.

Best Wishes To All and It’s About Making A Difference.

Yes, making a difference by perpetuating the lusts of the flesh and the degradation of women!

Very true to the spirit of ol' Berg!

Personally, I wonder if he takes himself seriously either, or is he just a wind-up merchant?

evanman wrote:

Personally, I wonder if he takes himself seriously either, or is he just a wind-up merchant?

I think he does. But he seems to have difficulty escaping his polarized views and not jumping into conclusions on matters he is uninformed in (e.g. He's convinced I work at some low-paying job and need a girlfriend ).

Other than that, I'm sure he's just a regular guy with flaws like the rest of us.

I should add, however, that he'll probably get himself banned if he keeps making ad hominem attacks at other users.

Personally, I wonder if he takes himself seriously either, or is he just a wind-up merchant?

I do beg to differ with you, I don't think he's quite normal, sorry. Especially when he went off talking about needing to look at men's butts or something silly and totally off the wall.

Acheick wrote:

I do beg to differ with you, I don't think he's quite normal, sorry. Especially when he went off talking about needing to look at men's butts or something silly and totally off the wall.

I may very well end up regretting what I said about him being a regular guy, but I always prefer to give people the benefit of the doubt--especially if I've never met them.