Infection control

  1. Nurse Forum
  2. » Nursing Talk
  3. » Infection control

Get Email Updates Email this Topic Print this Page

Reply Wed 25 Jan, 2006 12:08 pm
Infection control
Regarding pre-hospital infection risks for cannulation, I am planning to look at the aseptic techniques favoured by paramedics. I am hoping to identify, 'and to avoid shutting the door after the horse has bolted' areas, such as: storage and use of latex-free gloves. This will hopefully lead onto issues, such as: how the catheter hub may contribute to the colonisation of catheters. If anyone reading this knows of any research papers in this field, could they get in touch, as there seems to be a distinct lack of supporting evidence. In particular, it would be good to compare pre-hospital versus hospital. Confused
 
peaches 1
 
Reply Sat 28 Jan, 2006 03:51 pm
Pre-hospital infection rates.
When I worked in a big university teaching hospital, we ALWAYS removed the catheters that were started in the "field" by the paramedics, and put in new ones. The "field" catheters were considered "dirty" because we did not know under what circumstances it had been put in. This is the only hospital where I have seen this done. The paramedics I have worked with really take precautions to protect themselves from disease, so the catheters are probably okay, in my opinion. Don't know of any studies done on this, good luck.
 
rundontwine1
 
Reply Sun 29 Jan, 2006 11:04 am
Thanks very much, I have never heard of hospitals removing field catheters before, so perhaps the study I plan to do will reveal whether there truly is a risk of infection, or not, as the case may be.
 
 

 
  1. Nurse Forum
  2. » Nursing Talk
  3. » Infection control
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/14/2025 at 05:41:01