wo!! what a story.

i think one of the reasons is that we don't even know the real names, much less current locations of people who did this to us. that's my reason (besides being too chicken to look into it)

Re: Man charged 32 years after alleged rape
Yet another example: http://www.bostonherald.com/news/national/south/view.bg?articleid=1211720&srvc=rss

Re: Man charged 32 years after alleged rape
Another issue may just be different prosecutors. The one in that Rockwell story seems willing to press charges and get a guy arrested on the merest of allegations, whereas the ones people who have difficulty getting charges pressed may be more stringent with what cases they will pursue. That story is actually a really bad example where there's basically no case as far as I can tell based on the released details. I don't even think they should have arrested the guy until they had something substantial.

That second Herlad story about Alamo is worded oddly, it almost sounds like he's being jailed for taking the girls across the state lines. Whoever wrote that should get reprimanded to word it more clearly as I imagine the charges are for the sex itself.

Re: Man charged 32 years after alleged rape
Here in RI there is no statute of limitations on murder or 1st degree rape. The creepy Alamo dude made his crimes federal when he crossed state lines, The feds don't have a statute of limitations either.

Re: Man charged 32 years after alleged rape
reading about this i ran across this article. http://blog.beliefnet.com/bibleandculture/2009/11/remember-the-alamo----tony-alamo.html interesting parallels

The problem is that TFI kids were indoctrinated form toddlerhood to deny sexual abuse, so when the investigations happened the abused denied everything. It's not too late if you know the location and name of the someone who abused you . Unfortunately, most of the abusers used aliases and the abused only know them as uncle Mordecai or whatever and have now idea about their real names. The CIA could learn from these guys.