Without Unity: The sky becomes filthy, The Earth becomes unstable, the Spirits become unresponsive and disapear, The valleys become dry as deserts, Our leaders become corrupt and fall, and mankind becomes extinct.

With Unity: Heaven becomes pure, The Earth finds peace, The Spirits minister, The valleys become plentiful, Humanity sets the example, and the Universe becomes free. TAO and Me.

The Way is simply equality, and mathematically the equation is this: =.
Einstein's solution to UFT.. Equal unites all things, TOE..

"Today more than ever before, life must be characterized by a sense of Universal responsibility, not only nation to nation and human to human, but also humans to other forms of life." Dalai Lama

How can mankind achieve this unifying truth of ourselves, the equality of all things, the unity of the universe, or Oneness, the truth that is certainly meant to be, the truth that will set us free?

=
MJA

Please provide ONE SINGLE EXAMPLE OF THE STATIC QUALITY OF EQUALITY IN OUR DYNAMIC AND EVER-CHANGING NATURAL WORLD?

Conservation of mass and conservation of charge. But that sort of presumes that the universe is 100% self-contained, and this is theoretical, not empirical.

The great Astronomer, Edwin Hubble made the observation that in every direction he looked, every galaxy in the sky was moving away from us, while the nearer ones were moving more slowly, but the farther away a galaxy was the faster it was moving away from us. The only possible explanation was the process of expanding. Even Albert Einstein, disturbed that his theory of general relativity seemed to be inconsistent with a static universe, tried to modify the equations of the theory. When Hubble's observations showed that the universe was indeed expanding, Einstein retracted this modification and called it the biggest blunder of his life.

Please provide ONE SINGLE EXAMPLE OF THE STATIC QUALITY OF EQUALITY IN OUR DYNAMIC AND EVER-CHANGING NATURAL WORLD? Clearly, you exist within a Construct of increasing/decreasing, consuming/being consumed processes that are easily quantified by empirical measurements. The concept of equality ONLY EXISTS in the abstract realm of mathematical equations. Without an empirical example of equality (static-empirical contradiction) in the Natural World to PROVE PROCESS CREDIBILITY, your idealistic claim for equality will SIMPLY be relegated to the ash-heap of careless problematic ideals.

Its seens MJA decided to ignore the arguments of others and just keep singing the same nosense again. Just commenting this as a warning for anyone trying to speak to him

The great Astronomer, Edwin Hubble made the observation that in every direction he looked, every galaxy in the sky was moving away from us, while the nearer ones were moving more slowly, but the farther away a galaxy was the faster it was moving away from us. The only possible explanation was the process of expanding. Even Albert Einstein, disturbed that his theory of general relativity seemed to be inconsistent with a static universe, tried to modify the equations of the theory. When Hubble's observations showed that the universe was indeed expanding, Einstein retracted this modification and called it the biggest blunder of his life.

Mod Edit - No need for off-topic insults.

The great Astronomer, Edwin Hubble made the observation that in every direction he looked, every galaxy in the sky was moving away from us, while the nearer ones were moving more slowly, but the farther away a galaxy was the faster it was moving away from us. The only possible explanation was the process of expanding. Even Albert Einstein, disturbed that his theory of general relativity seemed to be inconsistent with a static universe, tried to modify the equations of the theory. When Hubble's observations showed that the universe was indeed expanding, Einstein retracted this modification and called it the biggest blunder of his life.

Equality, truth, unity, Oneness, freedom, or justice is nonsense to you?
They're truly One or the same and a wondefully beautiful song to sing.
Try it yourself, for rhe good of All, is for the good of One self.

=
MJA

These words carry subjective meanings, by thenselves are nothing.

I hope you find these words to be the self evident truth of everthing someday too

The only words that are self-evident are onomatopoeias, i.e. those that imitate a natural sound (like "meow", or "splash").

All other words are simply symbolic stand-ins, and they are only self-evident when used in context.

Well, I give up.

There is a symbol for unity and it looks like this: =

My word is One and One is truly me.
And I am true because I am One

I hope you find these words to be the self evident truth of everthing someday too, Just like me!

The Way that can be described is not the true Way.

MJA, get out of the way!!! BAM! Ahhh!!!

Chaos theory - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Oh, no, here's another!!! BOOOOOM!

Entropy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

There is a symbol for inequality and it looks like this: ≠

So, you can never be false? I'd wager you were false at least once in your life!

Could it be possible different people could have different "self-evident" truths?


It appears that you've taken a liking to Taoism, but even one of the opening lines of Tao Te Ching states:
You've described, so your way can't be true...hmm...

---

Just out of curiosity, do you always abide by equality throughout the day? For instance, do you make sure you take equal amount of steps with each foot, make sure you buy equal amounts of groceries, eat equal amounts of macronutrients, spend an equal amount of time at your job and posting on the forum? Or, is your belief in "equality" simply spiritual? I've asked you to explain in other threads, but now you've made a whole other thread directly revolving around this equality scheme. If you're trying to say something, you're going to have to be more explanatory because you're not getting through to people (from the looks of things!) If you really have the *truth*, wouldn't you want to get through to people? Here's a task: In your response, make sure there are no "=" signs